RESUMEN
Project BioEYES celebrated 20 years in K12 schools during the 2022-2023 school year. Using live zebrafish (Danio rerio) during week-long science experiments, sparks the interest of students and teachers from school districts, locally and globally. Over the past two decades, BioEYES has been replicated in different ways based on the interest and capacity of our partners. This article discusses several of the successful models, the common challenges, and how each BioEYES site has adopted guiding principles to help foster their success. The core principles of (a) reinforcing content that students are expected to learn in schools, while focusing on the students BECOMING scientists through hands-on experimentation and (b) establishing trust and buy-in from collaborating teachers and partners are what has led to BioEYES being sustained and replicated over the past two decades.
Asunto(s)
Ciencia , Pez Cebra , Animales , Humanos , Ciencia/educación , Instituciones Académicas , EstudiantesRESUMEN
Science can offer solutions to a wide range of societal problems. Key to capitalizing on such solutions is the public's trust and willingness to grant influence to scientists in shaping policy. However, previous research on determinants of trust is limited and does not factor in the diversity of scientific occupations. The present study (N = 2,780; U.S. participants) investigated how four well-established dimensions of social evaluations (competence, assertiveness, morality, warmth) shape trust in 45 types of scientists (from agronomists to zoologists). Trust in most scientists was relatively high but varied considerably across occupations. Perceptions of morality and competence emerged as the most important antecedents of trust, in turn predicting the willingness to grant scientists influence in managing societal problems. Importantly, the contribution of morality (but not competence) varied across occupations: Morality was most strongly associated with trust in scientists who work on contentious and polarized issues (e.g., climatologists). Therefore, the diversity of scientific occupations must be taken into account to more precisely map trust, which is important for understanding when scientific solutions find their way to policy.
Asunto(s)
Ciencia , Confianza , Humanos , Políticas , Ocupaciones , Principios MoralesAsunto(s)
Ética , Nacionalsocialismo , Prejuicio , Edición , Humanos , Ética/historia , Ética Médica/historia , Alemania , Historia del Siglo XX , Medicina , Nacionalsocialismo/historia , Prejuicio/ética , Prejuicio/etnología , Prejuicio/historia , Propaganda , Edición/ética , Edición/historia , Edición/normas , Ciencia/ética , Ciencia/historia , Racismo Sistemático/ética , Racismo Sistemático/etnología , Racismo Sistemático/historia , Estados Unidos , Derechos Humanos/ética , Derechos Humanos/historiaAsunto(s)
Gobierno Federal , Política , Política Pública , Ciencia , Política Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Pública/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Ciencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ciencia/tendencias , Política Ambiental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Ambiental/tendencias , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/tendenciasAsunto(s)
Presupuestos , Becas , 60517 , Investigadores , Ciencia , Brasil , Becas/economía , 60517/economía , Investigadores/economía , Investigadores/educación , Ciencia/economía , Ciencia/educaciónRESUMEN
This editorial introduces the collection, "Specialists with Spirit: Re-Enchanting the Vocation of Science," co-edited by Dorien Daling and Hanneke Hoekstra. The collection offers a tribute to the eminent historian of science, Klaas van Berkel, commemorating his retirement from the University of Groningen. The papers compel us to consider the ongoing tensions between knowledge production and the social, political, and economic constraints faced by scholars, a theme that Max Weber famously addressed in his 1917 lecture, Wissenschaft als Beruf, which the collection's contributors revisit as they consider a range of historical and contemporary questions concerning science and its study by historians.
Asunto(s)
Ciencia , Ocupaciones , Jubilación , Cabeza , Análisis de Series de Tiempo InterrumpidoRESUMEN
Dr. Londa Schiebinger is an international leader on the intersection of sex, gender, and science. In this interview with Cell, she discusses the Gendered Innovations project, the persistent STEM gender gap, the importance of considering sex- and gender-related variables and intersectionality in research, and the future of sex and gender research.